MREL Regulation: Bank Resilience and Compliance in Sweden

The Minimum Requirement for own funds and Eligible Liabilities (MREL) stands as a cornerstone of contemporary banking regulation, strategically designed to fortify the resilience and stability of the financial system across Europe, with a specific focus on Sweden. This critical regulatory framework mandates that financial institutions uphold a robust capital architecture, which includes a well-defined mixture of own funds and eligible liabilities that can be swiftly mobilised—either written down or converted into equity—during periods of financial distress.

Source

[1]

Kravet på kapitalbas och kvalificerad skuld – första kvartalet 2024

Riksgälden förvaltar statsskulden, ansvarar för statens betalningar, ger statliga garantier och lån samt hanterar banker i kris och insättningsgarantin.

Logga Riksgälden, klicka för att komma till startsidan

[2]

MREL and EBA Compliance Requirements

Swedish banks are advancing towards MREL compliance, aligning with EBA guidelines for enhanced financial stability. With a 2024 deadline, this transformative journey represents a strategic shift in crisis management and fiscal responsibility.

GrandAlessandro Micagni

MREL's Framework and Implementation

MREL regulation aims to ensure that banks are not only equipped to handle crises with minimal disruption but also structured to avoid the need for governmental bailouts, thereby protecting the broader economy and maintaining financial system integrity. The directive is pivotal in promoting a disciplined financial environment where banks can sustain operations and meet obligations despite significant financial pressures.

Key Aspects of MREL Regulation:

• Strategic Intent and Regulatory Evolution: Originally instituted as part of the European Union’s response to the financial crisis of 2008, MREL targets to mitigate risks associated with large banking institutions that could potentially threaten economic stability. Over the years, the regulation has evolved, guided by updates and insights from financial authorities such as the European Banking Authority (EBA) and national entities like the Swedish National Debt Office (Riksgälden). These enhancements continually adapt to the changing landscape of global finance, ensuring that regulations remain relevant and effectively mitigate risks.

• Detailed Requirements and Calculations: MREL is calculated based on two principal components—the risk-weighted and the non-risk-weighted requirements. The risk-weighted requirement hinges on a detailed assessment of the bank's risk exposure levels, incorporating factors such as credit risk, market risk, and operational risk, as defined under Basel III regulations. The non-risk-weighted requirement, conversely, is primarily determined by the leverage ratio, ensuring that banks maintain a minimum absolute amount of own funds relative to their total exposure, regardless of risk assessment.

• Subordinated Requirement Focus: A distinctive feature of the MREL is its emphasis on subordinated liabilities. This requirement stipulates that a significant portion of MREL must be met using subordinated debt instruments. These financial instruments are critical as they are designed to absorb losses, positioned after more senior obligations in the event of a bank's liquidation. The structuring of debt to include subordinated liabilities enhances a bank's loss-absorbing capacity, thus reinforcing financial stability.

The Role of Riksgälden in MREL Implementation

In Sweden, the implementation of MREL is closely monitored and reported by Riksgälden, the Swedish National Debt Office, which plays a pivotal role in overseeing the compliance of Swedish banks. Riksgälden’s rigorous approach involves regular assessments and detailed reporting that covers how banks meet both the risk-weighted and non-risk-weighted MREL requirements. Their reports provide transparency and insights into the banks' capabilities to withstand financial instabilities and contribute to a more resilient banking sector.

MREL and Its Calculation: A Technical Overview

The Minimum Requirement for own funds and Eligible Liabilities (MREL) is a key regulatory framework designed to ensure that banks maintain sufficient loss-absorbing capacity to effectively manage crises without endangering financial stability. This requirement is articulated through two distinct components: the Risk-Weighted Requirement (RWR) and the Non-Risk-Weighted Requirement (NRWR), each tailored to address different aspects of bank resilience.

Risk-Weighted Requirement (RWR)

The Risk-Weighted Requirement is a critical component of MREL, calculated as a percentage of the Total Risk Weighted Assets (TREA). This calculation is pivotal in determining the minimum amount of own funds and eligible liabilities that banks must hold to cover potential losses associated with their risk exposures. The RWR is composed of two main elements:

1. Loss Absorption Amount (LAA): The LAA is foundational to the RWR, incorporating the aggregate of a bank’s Pillar 1 and Pillar 2 requirements.

• Pillar 1 Requirements: These are regulatory capital requirements set to cover credit, market, and operational risks as defined by the Basel Accords. Typically, this requirement is standardized across banks but can be adjusted based on specific risk profiles.

• Pillar 2 Requirements: These are supervisory capital requirements tailored to the specific risks and conditions of each bank, determined through regulatory review processes. Pillar 2 adjustments are intended to cover risks not fully captured by Pillar 1, including concentration risk, liquidity risk, and other factors influencing a bank's overall risk profile.

1. Recapitalisation Amount (RCA): The RCA is designed to ensure that banks have additional capital to support their ongoing operations and restore their financial health following a crisis. This amount includes a market confidence charge (MCC), which is adjusted by the countercyclical buffer. The MCC is a crucial component that reflects additional capital needs to maintain market confidence under stressed conditions, while the countercyclical buffer aims to accumulate capital in good times that can be drawn down in bad times.

Non-Risk-Weighted Requirement (NRWR)

The Non-Risk-Weighted Requirement is defined as a percentage of the Total Exposure Measure (LRE), ensuring that banks maintain a minimum level of capital regardless of their risk-weighted assets. This requirement is crucial for providing a safety net that is not solely dependent on the risk assessment models, which may vary significantly between institutions. The NRWR primarily hinges on:

• Minimum Leverage Ratio: Set at 3% of the LRE, this ratio ensures that banks have an absolute minimum of own funds in relation to their total exposure, which includes off-balance sheet exposures. This baseline is critical in preventing excessive leverage, which was one of the key lessons from the financial crisis.

MREL Compliance Among Swedish Banks: A Deep Dive into Q1 2024 Performance

The Swedish National Debt Office (Riksgälden)’s report for the first quarter of 2024 highlights significant compliance with the Minimum Requirement for own funds and Eligible Liabilities (MREL) among Swedish banks. This analysis explores the levels of adherence from both major banking institutions and smaller entities within the Swedish financial system, showcasing how these institutions not only meet but frequently exceed the stipulated regulatory standards.

Analysis of Compliance Metrics Across Major Swedish Banks

The data from Riksgälden offers detailed insights into how each bank's capital structure aligns with the stringent demands of MREL, emphasizing a strong foundation in risk management and financial resilience:

1. SEB (Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken) and Swedbank:
   • Both SEB and Swedbank have reported MREL compliance rates with capital bases and qualified liabilities significantly exceeding 44% of their Total Risk Weighted Assets (TREA). This not only demonstrates their robust capital management strategies but also their ability to maintain a cushion well above the regulatory minimums, which enhances their stability and capacity to absorb financial shocks.
   • The substantial capital reserves reflect a proactive approach in maintaining liquidity and safeguarding depositor and investor interests under varied economic conditions.
2. Handelsbanken:

• Known for its conservative banking approach, Handelsbanken showcased robust compliance with an emphasis on strong capital bases and qualified liabilities. This institution's strategy often involves maintaining higher capital ratios than required, ensuring an extra layer of security against potential financial downturns.
• Handelsbanken’s management of its capital structure is a testament to its commitment to exceeding regulatory expectations, contributing to its reputation for stability and reliability in the Swedish banking sector.

MREL Compliance Among Smaller Institutions

The report also casts light on the compliance strategies of smaller banks such as Landshypotek and Länsförsäkringar, which play crucial roles in the regional banking landscapes:

3. Landshypotek:
   • Specializing in agricultural and forestry sector financing, Landshypotek demonstrated substantial MREL compliance, which is critical for supporting the niche industries that depend heavily on this institution for funding.
   • Their ability to meet and exceed MREL requirements underscores their operational resilience and strategic financial management, essential for sustaining sector-specific lending activities during volatile economic periods.
4. Länsförsäkringar:
   • As a smaller entity, Länsförsäkringar’s compliance emphasizes the effectiveness of MREL regulations across diverse bank sizes and scopes of operation. Their performance highlights how well-integrated risk management protocols contribute to overall financial health and compliance.
   • The bank’s success in meeting MREL standards reflects a well-structured approach to capital allocation and risk assessment, aligning with broader financial stability objectives.

Subordinated Requirement Details in MREL Regulation

The subordinated requirement under the Minimum Requirement for own funds and Eligible Liabilities (MREL) is a vital aspect designed to enhance the loss-absorbing capacity of banks in times of financial distress. This requirement ensures that a specified portion of MREL targets is met through subordinated debt instruments, which are critical in structuring the hierarchy of claims in the event of a bank's resolution. These instruments are intended to absorb losses, standing behind senior debt in priority, thus protecting more senior creditors and potentially reducing the systemic impact of a bank's failure.

Technical Analysis of Subordinated Requirement Components

The subordinated requirement is bifurcated into two distinct components, each tailored to address specific facets of a bank’s financial structure and risk exposure:

1. Risk-Weighted Subordinated Requirement (RWSR):
   • Calculation Methodology: This component requires banks to double the sum of their Pillar 1 and Pillar 2 capital requirements. The rationale behind doubling these figures lies in creating a robust buffer that enhances the institution's stability before any senior claims are at risk in a resolution scenario.

• Pillar 1 and Pillar 2 Overview:

• Pillar 1: Consists of the minimum capital requirements that banks must hold to cover various standardized risks including credit, market, and operational risks.
• Pillar 2: Includes additional capital recommendations made by regulators based on a more tailored assessment of the bank's risk profile, which may cover concentration risks, interest rate risks in the banking book, and other idiosyncratic risks not fully captured under Pillar 1.

• Non-Risk-Weighted Subordinated Requirement (NRWSR):

• Setting the Benchmark: This is set at 8% of the bank’s total liabilities and capital base. This threshold ensures that banks maintain a significant layer of subordinated liabilities relative to their total financial structure, providing a substantial cushion to absorb losses in a stress scenario before impacting non-subordinated creditors.
• Cap and Proportionality: It is important to note that this requirement caps the allocation that does not exceed the non-risk-weighted MREL target, thereby balancing the need for substantial risk coverage with the imperative to avoid overly burdening the bank with costly capital requirements that could hinder its operational efficiency or competitive position.

Strategic Financial Planning Under MREL

The architecture of the Minimum Requirement for own funds and Eligible Liabilities (MREL), especially its subordinated component, requires banks to engage in meticulous strategic financial planning. This planning is crucial for maintaining a balanced capital structure that aligns with regulatory expectations and supports the bank's operational objectives. By effectively managing their capital allocation, banks can ensure that they meet the MREL requirements without compromising their operational efficiency or financial performance.

• Capital Management: Banks need to optimize their capital structure to include an appropriate mix of senior and subordinated debt. This balance is crucial not only for meeting the subordinated requirements of MREL but also for minimizing the cost of capital. Efficient capital management helps in maintaining liquidity and funding operations, which are vital for the bank's day-to-day functioning.

• Risk Management: Enhanced focus on subordinated liabilities encourages banks to improve their risk assessment processes. This involves a more granular evaluation of asset quality, risk exposure, and the potential impact of stress scenarios on their capital adequacy. By strengthening risk management, banks can better prepare for potential financial downturns, aligning with the primary goals of MREL to enhance stability and resilience in the financial system.

Financial Sector Stability

The structured approach required by MREL has significant implications for the stability of the broader financial sector:

1. Enhanced Resilience: By requiring banks to maintain a higher buffer of loss-absorbing capital, MREL directly contributes to the resilience of financial institutions. This buffer ensures that banks can withstand financial shocks and continue to operate without resorting to government bailouts, thereby supporting financial stability and reducing systemic risks.
2. Market Confidence: Effective implementation and compliance with MREL regulations bolster investor and market confidence in the banking sector. This confidence stems from the enhanced transparency and robustness of banks' financial health, making them more reliable and stable financial partners.

Conclusion

The first quarter of 2024 has showcased encouraging results in MREL compliance among Swedish banks, illustrating the effectiveness of these regulatory frameworks in ensuring financial stability. The dynamic adaptation and stringent enforcement of MREL requirements are imperative as the financial landscape continues to evolve. This detailed exploration of MREL compliance provides stakeholders with essential insights to navigate the complexities of regulatory challenges, thereby ensuring the robustness and stability of the banking sector amidst shifting financial dynamics.

The ongoing focus on both the broad and nuanced components of MREL regulation is critical in sustaining the health and stability of the banking sector amid continuous financial developments. As banks adjust to these regulations, the overall financial ecosystem becomes more resilient, reducing the likelihood of crises and enhancing the capacity for sustainable growth in the financial sector. This comprehensive understanding of MREL's implications for operational efficiency and financial stability plays a pivotal role in guiding banks and regulators through the evolving challenges of modern finance.