AML/CFT UK Supervisory Models

The HM Treasury's revamp of the UK's AML/CTF supervisory system signals a transformative phase for financial entities. With four proposed models, from enhancing OPBAS to centralized supervisions like SAS, stakeholders must navigate changing compliance landscapes.

AML/CFT  UK Supervisory Models
UK Regulatory Reform

AML/CTF Supervisory Models: HM Treasury Seeks Consultation

Source: Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales Keywords AML CTF

The HM Treasury (HMT) is in the process of reviewing and reforming its Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing (AML/CTF) supervisory system. This development comes in response to a 2022 review that proposed four potential models for a future AML/CTF system. Currently, the supervisory system is managed by three statutory supervisors including the Financial Conduct Authority, the Gambling Commission, and HMRC, along with 22 professional body supervisors (PBSs) who oversee the legal and accountancy sectors. In an effort to ensure compliance with Money Laundering Regulations (MLRs) and maintain integrity within regulated businesses, these supervisors play a crucial role.


The 2016 AML/CTF Action Plan led to the creation of the Office for Professional Body Anti-Money Laundering Supervision (OPBAS) to enhance supervision across PBSs and foster information sharing with law enforcement agencies. Despite significant improvements, the 2022 review identified certain weaknesses, suggesting that structural reforms may be necessary. The four proposed models for future AML/CTF supervisory system include OPBAS+, PBS Consolidation, Single Professional Services Supervisor (SPSS), and Single Anti-Money Laundering Supervisor (SAS). These models are being assessed against three objectives: supervisory effectiveness, improved system coordination, and feasibility.




UK's AML/CTF Supervisory System: What Financial Entities Need to Know


The UK's commitment to combating illicit finance takes another significant step with the HM Treasury's (HMT) decision to reform its Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing (AML/CTF) supervisory system. In the ever-evolving financial landscape, understanding these changes is pivotal for banks, financial institutions, gambling establishments, and even legal and accountancy firms.



The existing supervisory structure, birthed from the 2016 AML/CTF Action Plan, is anchored by three stalwarts: the Financial Conduct Authority, the Gambling Commission, and HMRC. They've been complemented by 22 professional body supervisors (PBSs) that diligently oversee nuances in the legal and accountancy sectors. The Office for Professional Body Anti-Money Laundering Supervision (OPBAS) was a notable outcome from the Action Plan, formed with the intent to bolster supervision across PBSs and amplify information sharing amongst law enforcement agencies.



A 2022 review threw the spotlight on the existing system's vulnerabilities, underscoring the necessity for structural reforms. It's this backdrop that positions the consultation process at the heart of the matter, aiming to iron out the creases and infuse more robustness into the AML/CTF supervisory apparatus.




AML/CTF Models on the Horizon


Four intriguing models emerge as the front-runners for shaping the future AML/CTF terrain:


  • OPBAS+: An augmentation of the current OPBAS model, promising enriched regulatory powers.

  • PBS Consolidation: A potential streamline strategy, concentrating regulatory functions by reducing the number of PBSs.

  • SPSS (Single Professional Services Supervisor): A consolidated approach for professional services, offering consistent regulatory measures, albeit possibly at the expense of sector-specific expertise.

  • SAS (Single Anti-Money Laundering Supervisor): A vision of centralized AML/CTF supervision, ensuring consistency but possibly birthing a complex regulatory giant.

The repercussions of these reforms will ripple across the financial sector, altering compliance paradigms and reshaping collaborations. With the UK's resilience against illicit finance hanging in the balance, the chosen model will undoubtedly influence information sharing dynamics between supervisors and law enforcement entities.



For entities vested in the UK financial sector, proactive measures are crucial. Initiating internal AML/CTF audits, fostering open communication with supervisory bodies, and staying updated with the evolving regulatory landscape are imperative. The transitional journey, ranging from immediate awareness to potential full-scale adaptations, could extend over a year, emphasizing the need for preparedness.



As search engines and financial professionals scour for updates on the UK's AML/CTF supervisory reforms, understanding the historical context, the proposed models, and the necessary compliance measures will be indispensable. The financial sector is on the cusp of transformation, and staying informed will be the key to seamless navigation.




Read More

Treasury consults on AML/CTF supervisory system
ICAEW will respond to HM Treasury’s consultation on reform of the anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing supervisory system, published in June 2023 in line with a commitment in the Economic Crime Plan 2023-26.




Grand is Live

Check out our GPT4 powered GRC Platform

Sign up Free

Reduce your
compliance risks