Operational Resilience: A new Financial Imperative
Major IT outages, cyberattacks, and unforeseen disruptions can devastate financial institutions. Learn how operational resilience ensures stability, protects consumer trust, and meets regulatory demands, from scenario testing to vendor risk management and advanced cybersecurity solutions.
Operational Resilience: A Wake-Up Call for Financial Institutions
Imagine it’s a regular Monday morning. Millions of people across the globe wake up, ready to start their day. Salaries are scheduled to be credited, businesses need to process transactions and investors are preparing for the opening bell. Suddenly, something goes wrong.
Banking apps freeze, ATMs stop working, online payments fail and a wave of panic spreads. Customers flood social media with complaints, businesses face massive transaction delays and within hours, financial institutions are facing not just reputational damage but also regulatory scrutiny and financial losses. This isn’t a scene from a dystopian novel - it’s a reality that financial institutions have faced due to major IT outages, cyberattacks and unforeseen disruptions. The financial sector, the backbone of the global economy, is constantly under threat. This is why operational resilience is no longer optional - it’s a necessity.
What Is Operational Resilience?
Operational Resilience is an organisation's ability to prepare for, withstand, adapt, respond to and recover from disruptions while ensuring that essential services remain available to customers. It's not just about preventing disruptions but being able to operate despite them.
Why Operational Resilience Matters?
The financial industry is a complex web of transactions, technology, regulation and trust. When an institution faces a disruption, it doesn’t just impact them—it ripples across markets, economies and everyday lives. Operational resilience ensures financial stability, preserves consumer trust, and aligns with regulatory mandates from the European Central Bank (ECB), European Banking Authority (EBA), and national regulators.
Beyond regulatory compliance, operational resilience is crucial for multiple reasons:
- Economic Stability: A resilient financial sector prevents cascading failures that could destabilize economies, ensuring continued liquidity and market confidence.
- Consumer Protection: Customers depend on financial institutions for daily transactions, savings, and investments. Any disruption erodes trust and can lead to mass withdrawals or reduced engagement with financial services.
- Business Continuity: Financial institutions must ensure seamless operations despite unforeseen events such as cyberattacks, supply chain failures, or natural disasters.
- Competitive Advantage: Organizations that proactively build resilience can recover faster from disruptions, maintaining market leadership and operational efficiency.
- Cybersecurity Threats: With increasing digitization, financial services are prime targets for cybercriminals. A strong operational resilience strategy minimizes vulnerabilities and enhances rapid response capabilities.
- Third-Party Risk Management: Many financial institutions rely on external service providers for critical operations. Operational resilience ensures these dependencies do not become single points of failure.
- Reputational Integrity: Failures in service delivery can lead to public distrust, regulatory fines, and a long-term decline in brand credibility.
- Climate and Geopolitical Risks: Climate-related financial risks and geopolitical tensions (such as sanctions or economic instability) require financial institutions to be adaptable and prepared for prolonged disruptions.
As financial institutions across Europe embrace digital transformation, resilience must be a foundational principle, ensuring not only compliance but also long-term sustainability in an increasingly volatile world.
The Evolution of Operational Resilience
Operational resilience has undergone a profound transformation over the years, evolving from a reactive, compliance-driven function to a proactive, strategic imperative. Traditionally, businesses primarily focused on disaster recovery and business continuity planning, aiming to restore operations after disruptions. However, a series of major crises and technological failures over the years have driven a fundamental shift in approach - reshaped it, highlighting the need for a more dynamic and adaptive resilience framework.
But what happens when resilience falls short? Let’s look at these real-world incidents that shook industries and exposed vulnerabilities. These cases serve as powerful reminders of why proactive resilience planning is essential.
I. 2008 Financial Crisis: A Wake-Up Call for Risk Management It was an ordinary day at a bustling London trading floor in 2008. Phones rang non-stop, traders shouted buy and sell orders, and financial markets hummed with activity. Then, the news hit - Lehman Brothers had collapsed. Within hours, the shockwaves rippled across the world. Investors scrambled to pull their money, stock markets plunged and European banks faced massive liquidity shortages. Panic set in as governments rushed to prevent a financial meltdown.
What Went Wrong?
1. Banks held too little capital to absorb shocks.
2. Complex financial instruments masked real risks.
3. No unified European crisis response framework.
What Changed?
1. 2010: Basel III introduced strict capital and liquidity requirements.
2. 2014: BRRD mandated banks to create recovery and resolution plans.
3. Ongoing: EBA stress tests regularly assess financial stability.
II. Rise of Cyber Threats: WannaCry & NotPetya (2017)
In May 2017, the IT department of a major European bank noticed unusual activity files were being encrypted and a ransom demand appeared on-screen.
Within minutes, branches across the continent were locked out of their systems. ATMs stopped dispensing cash. Call centers were overwhelmed. The culprit? WannaCry, a ransomware attack that spread across 150 countries, crippling businesses and government institutions. Just weeks later, NotPetya struck, erasing data and bringing even more chaos.
What Went Wrong?
1. Many financial institutions failed to update their IT systems.
2. Weak cybersecurity governance exposed critical data.
3. No global coordination to counter large-scale cyberattacks.
What Changed?
1. 2016: The NIS Directive introduced minimum cybersecurity standards.
2. 2018: GDPR imposed strict data protection and breach notification rules.
3. 2023: NIS2 expanded cybersecurity obligations for financial services.
III. TSB Bank IT Outage (2018): A Case Study in Poor IT Migration
Sophia, a small business owner in London, was finalizing payroll for her employees when she realized she couldn’t access her TSB bank account. She wasn’t alone. Across the UK, nearly two million customers were locked out due to a catastrophic IT migration failure. Furious customers stormed TSB branches, demanding answers. The bank’s CEO was forced to issue multiple public apologies and regulators launched an investigation.
What Went Wrong?
1. The migration was rushed and insufficiently tested.
2. The bank lacked oversight of its IT vendors.
3. Contingency plans were inadequate.
What Changed?
1. 2019: Regulators tightened third-party IT risk requirements.
2. 2021: UK’s Operational Resilience Framework introduced strict IT failure impact tolerances.
3. Ongoing: Financial firms must conduct resilience testing before major IT changes.
IV. COVID-19 (2020): The Ultimate Test for Business Continuity
March 2020, the world shuts down. Financial institutions scramble to transition to remote work. Cybercriminals exploit the chaos, launching phishing attacks and ransomware campaigns. Customers flood banks with inquiries about mortgage deferrals and emergency loans. It’s a crisis like no other - testing not just financial stability, but also the adaptability of entire banking operations.
What Went Wrong?
1. Few banks had plans for long-term remote operations.
2. Cyber fraud exploded, targeting newly remote systems.
3. Heavy reliance on third-party vendors left institutions vulnerable.
What Changed?
1. 2021: UK’s Operational Resilience Framework mandated impact tolerance testing.
2. 2022: DORA introduced ICT risk management and third-party oversight in the EU.
3. Ongoing: Regular scenario testing for pandemic-like crises is now standard.
V. Microsoft IT Outage (2024): The Risks of Cloud Dependency
January 2024, it started as a routine security update. Within minutes, banks, payment processors and businesses relying on Microsoft’s cloud services experienced a total blackout. Customers were unable to make online payments. Some businesses lost access to critical transaction records. A minor technical update had led to one of the biggest IT failures in financial history.
What Went Wrong?
1. Too many institutions depended on a single cloud provider.
2. No backup systems were in place for such a large-scale failure.
3. Regulatory oversight of tech providers was lacking.
What Changed?
1. 2022: DORA enforced direct supervision of ICT service providers.
2. 2023: Regulators mandated multi-cloud strategies to avoid single points of failure.
3. 2024: Banks are now required to conduct third-party resilience testing.
These incidents serve as stark reminders that financial institutions must be prepared for the unexpected. Each of these events acted as a catalyst, pushing organizations beyond traditional risk management and into a resilience-first mindset. Today, operational resilience is no longer just about preventing disruptions - it's about ensuring businesses can anticipate, absorb and recover from shocks while maintaining trust, stability and long-term sustainability.
Organizations that fail to prepare risk not only financial loss but also customer trust, reputational damage and long-term instability. The key question is: Is your organization ready for the unexpected?
Operational Resilience Regulatory Landscape
The financial world moves fast—sometimes too fast. Over the years, we’ve seen financial crises, cyberattacks and massive disruptions that have threatened the global economy. To prevent chaos, regulators in Europe have rolled out strict frameworks to ensure financial stability, protect consumers and stop reckless banking practices.
Let’s break down the most important regulations, why they were created and how they keep our financial system from falling apart. Here’s how key frameworks are shaping resilience:
1. Solvency II (2009) – Protecting the Insurance Industry
Banks weren’t the only ones with financial weaknesses before 2008—insurance companies also needed better risk management. The EU introduced Solvency II in 2009 to ensure insurers had enough financial reserves to handle major disasters and claims.
How It Works:
- Capital Reserves: Insurers must hold enough money to cover potential claims and disasters.
- Governance & Risk Management: They must proactively identify risks and plan for them.
- Transparency: Insurers must regularly report their financial health to regulators.
2. Basel III (2010) – Keeping Banks from Collapsing
Banks play a critical role in the economy, but without proper regulations, they can take excessive risks that put financial stability in danger. Same happened in 2008 financial crisis. Banks were taking huge risks with borrowed money and when things went south, many collapsed, triggering a global meltdown. Governments had to bail them out and taxpayers paid the price.
To prevent this from happening again, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) introduced Basel III in 2010. In the EU, it was implemented through CRD IV (2013) and CRR (2013).
How It Works:
- More Capital, Less Risk: Banks must hold more money in reserve to cover potential losses.
- Liquidity Buffers: They need enough cash or liquid assets to survive financial shocks.
- Stress Testing: Regulators run financial "fire drills" to see if banks can withstand economic crises.
3. The UK’s Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) (2013) – A Financial Watchdog
After the financial crisis, the UK created the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) in 2013 to oversee banks, insurers, and other financial firms. The PRA ensures financial institutions don’t take reckless risks and have strong operational resilience.
How It Works:
- Mapping Critical Functions: Firms must identify their most important operations and protect them.
- Resilience Testing: They need to prove they can recover from disruptions.
- Tighter Third-Party Rules: If a firm uses external services (e.g., cloud storage), those providers must meet strict security and reliability standards.
4. Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive (BRRD) (2014) – No More Taxpayer Bailouts
Before BRRD, failing banks were often bailed out with public money, which was unfair to taxpayers and encouraged reckless risk-taking. Introduced in 2014, BRRD forces banks to take responsibility for their own failures.
How It Works:
- Living Wills: Banks must plan for financial distress and have a roadmap for recovery.
- Bail-ins, Not Bailouts: Shareholders and creditors take the hit before taxpayers do.
- Early Intervention: Regulators can step in and take action before a crisis escalates.
5. NIS Directive (2016) – The EU’s First Cybersecurity Law
As cyber threats became a growing concern, the EU introduced the Network and Information Security (NIS) Directive in 2016 - the first set of laws focused on improving cybersecurity across Europe, including in the financial sector.
How It Works:
- Security Requirements: Financial institutions must strengthen their cybersecurity defenses.
- Incident Reporting: Cyberattacks must be reported quickly to regulators.
- Stronger Collaboration: EU member states must work together to tackle cybersecurity threats.
6. ECB’s TIBER-EU Framework (2018) – Ethical Hacking for Banks
Would you rather find a weakness in your bank’s security through a test - or by getting hacked for real? That’s the idea behind TIBER-EU, launched in 2018 by the European Central Bank (ECB).
How It Works:
- Simulated Cyberattacks: Ethical hackers try to break into banks’ systems to expose vulnerabilities.
- Constant Improvement: Banks learn from these tests and strengthen their defenses.
- Collaboration: Financial institutions and regulators work together to improve security.
7. UK’s Operational Resilience Framework (2021) – Post-Brexit Stability
After Brexit, the UK needed its own financial stability framework. In 2021, the Bank of England (BoE), Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) and Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) introduced new rules to keep the UK’s financial sector stable.
How It Works:
- Impact Tolerances: Banks must set limits on how long they can survive disruptions.
- Stress Testing: They must run scenario analyses for cyberattacks, IT failures and financial crashes.
- Stronger Governance: Executives are held accountable for resilience planning.
8. Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) (2022) – Fighting Cyber Threats
With banks relying more on digital infrastructure, cyber threats are now as dangerous as financial crises. A single cyberattack could cripple a bank, steal millions or shut down payment systems.
Recognizing this, the EU introduced DORA in 2022, setting strict cybersecurity rules for financial institutions.
- Cybersecurity First: Banks must have strong security defenses.
- Hacking Simulations: They must run penetration tests to find vulnerabilities before criminals do.
- Third-Party Oversight: If a bank uses external IT services, those providers must also follow strict security standards.
9. NIS2 Directive (2023) – Cybersecurity Gets Even Stricter
The original NIS Directive (2016) was Europe’s first major cybersecurity law, but as threats evolved, so did the need for stronger protection. NIS2, introduced in 2023, takes things further by expanding the rules to cover more sectors, including finance.
How It Works:
- Tighter Security Rules: Banks must follow even stricter cybersecurity protocols.
- Faster Incident Reporting: Cyberattacks must be reported immediately.
- Europe-Wide Collaboration: Countries work together to share intelligence on cyber threats.
Key Pillars of Operational Resilience
- Identification of Critical Business Services - For financial institutions, resilience starts with knowing what’s most important. Identifying and mapping critical business services ensures firms can protect core operations, comply with regulations and maintain customer trust.
This involves:
1. Conducting Business Impact Analyses (BIA) to pinpoint mission-critical services and their dependencies.
2. Mapping interconnections between technology, infrastructure and third-party providers to uncover vulnerabilities.
3. Implementing resilience measures to prevent financial instability, regulatory breaches or reputational damage in case of service disruptions.
- Impact Tolerances & Scenario Testing - Regulators, including the PRA and FCA, require financial firms to define impact tolerances - the maximum level of disruption an institution can withstand without causing systemic harm.
To achieve this, firms must:
1. Set clear tolerance thresholds for downtime, financial loss and operational disruptions.
2. Conduct real-world scenario testing, simulating cyberattacks, IT failures and geopolitical risks to stress-test resilience.
3. Ensure critical services can recover within regulatory timeframes to prevent customer detriment and market instability.
- Third-Party & Supply Chain Risk Management - Financial institutions rely heavily on outsourced services, from cloud providers to payment processors.
To mitigate third-party risks, firms must:
1. Conduct enhanced due diligence on vendors to ensure they meet operational resilience standards.
2. Establish contractual obligations requiring third parties to have robust business continuity and disaster recovery plans.
3. Perform regular audits and stress tests to assess vendor resilience and ensure compliance with regulatory expectations.
- Cybersecurity & IT Resilience - Cyber threats remain one of the biggest risks to financial services. A resilient IT infrastructure is essential to protecting against cyberattacks and ensuring regulatory compliance.
Key measures include:
1. Deploying AI-driven threat detection and real-time monitoring to prevent breaches.
2. Ensuring secure data redundancy and encrypted backups to safeguard sensitive information.
3. Adopting a zero-trust security model, enforcing strict authentication controls.
4. Conducting penetration testing and cyber drills to validate security defenses.
- Incident Response & Recovery - A well-structured incident response framework enables firms to react quickly to disruptions while staying compliant with regulatory reporting requirements.
Best practices include:
1. Developing predefined response playbooks for cyberattacks, IT failures and financial crime incidents.
2. Establishing cross-functional crisis management teams to coordinate responses.
3. Implementing transparent communication strategies to inform stakeholders, customers and regulators.
4. Running regular resilience exercises to ensure teams are prepared for real-world disruptions.
- Board & Senior Management Oversight - Regulatory bodies emphasize that operational resilience is a board-level responsibility.
Senior leadership must:
1. Integrate resilience planning into strategic decision-making and risk management frameworks.
2. Align risk assessments and business continuity plans (BCP) with corporate and regulatory expectations.
3. Allocate sufficient resources and funding to enhance resilience capabilities continuously.
4. Foster a resilience-first culture, ensuring all employees understand their role in safeguarding operations.
By embedding these principles into their operational frameworks, financial institutions can not only meet regulatory expectations but also build trust, stability and long-term business sustainability.
Operational Resilience: Grand Compliance Solutions
Operational resilience is crucial for financial institutions navigating today’s dynamic risk landscape. Cyber threats, IT failures, third-party vendor defaults and regulatory non-compliance can result in financial and reputational setbacks. Grand Compliance empowers financial institutions to fortify their operational resilience, ensuring stability and continuity in an ever-evolving landscape. By leveraging AI-powered, tailored solutions, businesses can strengthen their resilience and stay compliant with evolving regulations.
1. Centralised compliance management system
Cybersecurity threats pose a significant risk to operational stability. Grand Compliance mitigates these risks through:
- Compliance Management: Strengthen cybersecurity and IT resilience with a centralized compliance management system. Manage all compliance documents in one place - create, edit, collaborate, receive, track and store with version control and access management. Automate self-assessment surveys with minimal effort and gain valuable insights through intuitive dashboards. With automated compliance tracking and reporting, organizations can enhance security oversight, proactively address vulnerabilities and ensure regulatory adherence. Plan and monitor progress efficiently using built-in tools such as calendars, GANTT charts and Kanban boards for seamless project management.
2. Seamless Vendor Compliance and Risk Management
Vendor non-compliance or financial instability can disrupt operations. Grand Compliance enhances vendor risk management by:
- Vendor Compliance Solution: Ensure outsourcing arrangements remain fully compliant with evolving regulatory guidelines. Simplify vendor assessments with institution-specific evaluations, reducing manual effort while maintaining transparency and compliance. Contract Management automates tracking of vendor agreements and changes in outsourcing requirements. Indexed Search enables full-text searches across all contracts, regardless of format.
3. Strengthening IT System Resilience
IT failures can lead to financial and reputational damage. Grand Compliance helps organizations build IT resilience through:
- AI Compliance Solution: AI-driven semantic search for regulatory compliance in IT governance. Get instant, clear answers to any regulatory question, complete with highlighted relevant clauses for quick reference.
- Risk Management Software: Provides in-depth risk analysis to enhance decision-making and risk prevention. Identifies IT risks and integrates them into a structured risk mitigation strategy.
4. Ensuring Policy Compliance and Reducing Regulatory Fines
Failure to comply with evolving policies can result in penalties. Grand Compliance provides:
- Policies Management Software: Grand's team of 400 legal & compliance experts maintain and continuously update the policies you need to always be compliant with the ever changing regulatory landscape.
- AI Compliance Assistant: Provides a chat-based tool designed for seamless access to regulatory compliance data. With Grand Assistant, effortlessly retrieve regulatory documents using natural language queries. Simply ask, and the tool delivers precise, relevant information, making compliance navigation easier than ever. Grand Assistant GRC Software keeps you informed and compliant, ensuring confident decision-making at every step.
- Compliance Management: Enhance compliance oversight with automated solutions that streamline tracking and reporting. Leverage self-assessment tools and intuitive dashboards to monitor compliance status and identify gaps. Ensure organization-wide adherence by automating task distribution and follow-ups, keeping teams aligned and proactive.
Ensuring a Seamless & Resilient Financial System for the Future
Imagine a financial institution facing a sudden cyberattack. Instead of chaos, its well-prepared response strategy minimises downtime, safeguards customer data and ensures business continuity. This isn’t luck—it’s the result of proactive resilience planning.
In today’s financial landscape, resilience isn’t just about reacting to disruptions - it’s about embedding stability into every aspect of your operations. AI, automation and data-driven insights are transforming risk management, allowing organizations to adapt swiftly and turn challenges into opportunities.
Is your institution equipped to withstand the next disruption? Let’s explore how Grand Compliance can help you proactively strengthen resilience, streamline compliance and ensure long-term stability.