Capital requirements regulation: Implementation under Basel 3.1 reforms
HM Treasury and the PRA implement Basel 3.1 reforms, advancing capital requirements regulation to strengthen capital buffers and enhance financial stability in the UK banking sector.
HM Treasury is implementing significant changes to the UK’s financial regulatory landscape by applying the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (FSMA) model to the capital requirements framework for banks, building societies, and investment firms. These changes are central to the ongoing updates to the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) as part of the Basel 3.1 reforms, which aim to enhance the resilience of the financial sector following the global financial crisis. The legislative approach involves revoking certain parts of the CRR and modifying the Capital Buffers Regulation, with additional reforms proposed by the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) to establish a more proportionate prudential regime tailored to the UK market.
Source
[1]
HM Treasury
[2]
Background: Transition to the FSMA Model
The FSMA model, established under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000, serves as the foundation of the UK’s regulatory framework for financial services, offering a comprehensive approach to oversight. Post-Brexit, the UK inherited numerous EU regulations, including the Capital Requirements Regulation, which sets the standards for capital requirements in financial institutions. HM Treasury and the PRA are now focused on transitioning these assimilated EU laws into the FSMA model. This shift allows for more tailored, dynamic capital requirements regulation that aligns with the unique needs of the UK financial market while adhering to international standards under Basel 3.1.
Legislative Changes: Revoking and Replacing the CRR
A key element of the current reforms involves the revocation of specific sections of the Capital Requirements Regulation. The PRA will replace these revoked elements with new rules aligned with Basel 3.1 standards. These changes are pivotal in updating the UK’s capital requirements regulation to reflect international best practices, ensuring that the framework remains proportionate to the scale and complexity of UK financial institutions.
Key Areas of CRR Revisions:
- Risk-Weighted Assets (RWA) Calculation Adjustments: Basel 3.1 introduces enhanced methodologies for calculating RWAs, aimed at improving the risk sensitivity of capital requirements. This refinement is crucial for ensuring that capital requirements accurately reflect the risk exposure of financial institutions, enhancing the overall stability of the system.
- Leverage Ratio Framework: Revisions to the leverage ratio framework ensure that banks maintain adequate capital relative to their total exposures. These adjustments help limit the risks associated with excessive borrowing and provide a non-risk-based measure that acts as a safeguard against financial instability.
- Capital Buffers Modification: The modification and restatement of the Capital Buffers Regulation aim to better align capital buffer requirements with the specific risk profiles of institutions. This approach ensures that capital buffers are appropriately calibrated to absorb losses during periods of economic stress, strengthening the overall resilience of the financial system.
Basel 3.1 Reforms: Enhancing Capital Adequacy
The Basel 3.1 reforms mark the final phase of the post-crisis overhaul of the global banking system, targeting the enhancement of capital adequacy standards to bolster the resilience of financial institutions. The PRA’s implementation of Basel 3.1 includes revisions to standardized approaches for credit, market, and operational risks, focusing on enhancing the accuracy of risk-weighted asset calculations. These changes are critical for institutions that do not use internal models, ensuring that their capital requirements reflect actual risk exposures.
Key Basel 3.1 Features:
- Standardized Approaches for Credit, Market, and Operational Risks: Enhancements to these approaches improve the precision of risk-weighted asset calculations, aligning them more closely with the underlying risk. This is particularly important for institutions using standardized approaches rather than internal models.
- Output Floor Introduction: A key feature of Basel 3.1 is the implementation of an output floor, which limits the extent to which banks can reduce their capital requirements through internal risk models. The output floor ensures that capital levels remain prudent and consistent across different institutions, addressing the variability in capital requirements that can arise from different modeling approaches.
- Revised Leverage Ratio Requirements: The leverage ratio continues to serve as a crucial backstop against model risk and excessive leverage. Basel 3.1 updates to this ratio ensure that it remains a relevant tool for capital regulation, particularly during periods of economic stress, reinforcing the robustness of capital requirements regulation.
Legislative Approach to Capital Buffers Regulation
As part of the broader changes to capital requirements regulation, HM Treasury’s approach includes revoking and restating the Capital Buffers Regulation with necessary modifications. These buffers, such as the Capital Conservation Buffer (CCoB) and the Countercyclical Capital Buffer (CCyB), are designed to provide additional loss-absorbing capacity during economic or financial downturns. The revised regulations will refine buffer requirements to better align them with UK-specific risks and the new Basel standards, maintaining a resilient financial system that can withstand economic shocks.
Proportionate Prudential Regime for Smaller Institutions
Applying the FSMA model enables the introduction of a more proportionate prudential regime for smaller banks and building societies. Recognizing that these institutions pose less systemic risk than larger banks, the proposed reforms allow for a tailored regulatory approach that reduces the compliance burden while maintaining stability. This proportionate approach reflects the unique nature of smaller institutions, aligning regulatory requirements with their specific risk profiles and operational complexities.
Features of the Proposed Proportionate Regime
- Simplified Reporting Requirements: By streamlining reporting and compliance obligations, the regime aims to reduce operational costs for smaller institutions. This simplification allows these banks and building societies to allocate more resources to their core business activities rather than regulatory compliance.
- Tailored Supervisory Engagement: The PRA will provide supervisory guidance that matches the size and complexity of the institution, ensuring that oversight is effective without being overly burdensome. This approach supports a more responsive and manageable regulatory environment for smaller firms.
- Customized Capital Requirements: The proposed adjustments to capital requirements reflect the lower risk profiles of smaller banks and building societies, making the regulatory framework more relevant and less onerous. This customization ensures that the capital requirements regulation supports financial stability while fostering a competitive and diverse banking sector.
HM Treasury and PRA Consultation Process
HM Treasury has released three draft pieces of legislation alongside the latest policy update, detailing proposed changes to the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR). These drafts, which include commencement regulations aimed at revoking specific CRR provisions and restating capital buffers with necessary modifications, are open for technical comments from industry stakeholders within a six-week period. This consultation process underscores HM Treasury and the PRA’s collaborative approach in refining capital requirements regulation, ensuring that the new rules are well-informed, balanced, and reflective of the evolving needs of the UK financial sector.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) has also published corresponding policy documents that outline the full Basel 3.1 package and additional prudential reforms. These documents provide further insight into how the PRA plans to implement the new capital requirements regulation and adapt the prudential regime to address the specific challenges and opportunities in the UK market. This includes near-final policy statements on critical aspects of Basel 3.1, such as the definition of capital provisions and the simplified capital regime for smaller institutions. The PRA’s proactive stance highlights its commitment to maintaining a forward-looking and adaptable regulatory environment that supports financial stability and market competitiveness.
Completing the FSMA Model Application
The transition to the FSMA model marks a pivotal step in reshaping the UK’s prudential framework and enhancing the capital requirements regulation. By revoking and replacing elements of the CRR and making targeted modifications to capital buffers, HM Treasury and the PRA aim to establish a regulatory environment that is both resilient and adaptable. The ongoing reforms are designed to align the UK’s prudential standards with the latest Basel 3.1 updates while addressing the unique needs of the UK financial sector. This approach ensures that capital requirements regulation remains robust, supporting financial stability while fostering growth and innovation within the UK’s banking and financial services sectors.
Output Floor Introduction
A key component of Basel 3.1, the implementation of the output floor, is a critical measure within the updated capital requirements regulation. This floor limits the extent to which banks can reduce their capital requirements through internal risk models, ensuring that capital levels remain prudent and consistent across different institutions. Set at 72.5% of the capital requirements calculated using standardized approaches, the output floor effectively caps the capital relief achievable through internal models. This measure addresses the variability in risk-weighted assets (RWAs) generated by these models, which can lead to significant discrepancies in capital requirements among banks with similar risk profiles. The PRA’s implementation of the output floor aligns closely with Basel 3.1 guidelines but is specifically tailored to reflect UK market conditions, ensuring that capital requirements accurately reflect underlying risks while maintaining international comparability.
CRR: Revised Leverage Ratio Requirements
The leverage ratio is a fundamental element of capital requirements regulation, serving as a backstop measure against model risk and excessive leverage. Basel 3.1 introduces updates to the leverage ratio framework, including stricter definitions of exposures and new requirements for the treatment of off-balance sheet items, derivatives, and securities financing transactions. The PRA has adjusted these standards to better fit the UK context, ensuring that the leverage ratio remains a crucial tool for capital regulation, especially during periods of economic stress. The revised leverage ratio requirements will impose more stringent thresholds for systemically important institutions, further fortifying the UK’s financial system against the risks associated with excessive leverage.
Legislative Approach to Capital Buffers Regulation
HM Treasury’s legislative approach to capital buffers regulation includes revoking and restating existing buffer regulations to better align with Basel 3.1 standards. Capital buffers, such as the Capital Conservation Buffer (CCoB) and the Countercyclical Capital Buffer (CCyB), are critical components of the capital requirements regulation designed to provide additional loss-absorbing capacity during economic downturns. The revised regulations will incorporate adjustments to the calibration and activation of these buffers, ensuring that they are closely aligned with UK-specific risks. This tailored approach reflects the PRA’s emphasis on macroprudential oversight and its commitment to maintaining a resilient and adaptable prudential regulatory framework.
Proportionate Prudential Regime for Smaller Institutions
One of the transformative elements of the FSMA model’s application to capital requirements regulation is the introduction of a proportionate prudential regime for smaller banks and building societies. Recognizing that smaller institutions pose less systemic risk compared to larger counterparts, the proposed reforms under the PRA’s “Strong and Simple Framework” aim to simplify capital and reporting requirements, making regulation more accessible and proportionate to the size and complexity of these institutions.
Features of the Proposed Proportionate Regime
- Simplified Reporting Requirements: The new framework streamlines reporting and compliance obligations, reducing operational costs for smaller institutions. This includes modifications to the frequency and detail of required regulatory reports, aligning them with the lower risk profiles of Small Domestic Deposit Takers (SDDTs), thereby allowing these institutions to focus more resources on core activities rather than regulatory compliance.
- Tailored Supervisory Engagement: The PRA will provide supervisory guidance proportionate to the size and complexity of each institution, ensuring that regulatory oversight is both effective and manageable. This shift toward more flexible supervisory reviews and continuous dialogue reduces the administrative burden while maintaining high prudential standards.
- Customized Capital Requirements: Capital requirements for smaller banks and building societies will be adjusted to reflect their unique risk profiles, ensuring that the regulatory framework remains relevant and less burdensome. This could involve lower capital ratios or simplified capital calculations, specifically designed to accommodate the reduced risk and operational scale of these institutions without compromising overall financial stability.
Reduce your
compliance risks
